Proposed smoking ban is good for Pulaski County

Letters

August 27, 2008

Readers Views

Anonymous The Commonwealth Journal Wed Aug 27, 2008, 07:50 AM EDT

Dear Editor:

In Saturday’s edition of the CJ, Aug. 23, 2008, you covered the Proposed Smoking Ban Topic of Forum. Let me first applaud both Dr. Weigel and Gloria Sams. Both of these individuals have stood up consistently and taken a barrage of hits, comments, slurs and slanders because of the conviction of what is right. These people really can be called heroes.

As a health and fitness professional myself, I was invited to attend the forum on Thursday evening but due to a conflict in my scheduling I was unable to be there and I am sure that may be the case for many others. But even though I was absent from the forum I am doing my part by writing a letter to Judge Bullock, which I hope he will read.

I want to also applaud the city councilors for being in attendance but I want to ask why the magistrates chose not to show up?

I pay my taxes and I expect these people to do their job and part of that job should be to listen to these forums.

Over the last several months I have been giving this proposed smoking ban some deep thought and here is what I have concluded:

There are four reasons why people smoke:

1. Peer pressure/adolescence exploring and rebelliousness

2. Economics/family raised tobacco and, therefore, uses the products

3. Pleasure/only after the body fighting the initial life destroying effects of inhaling toxins into the lungs.

4. Addiction.

Now after reasoning this was the four reasons why people smoke, I decided to compare this to breathing and this is what I have come up with:

1. God gave us lungs to breathe with to sustain life

2. Man gave us cigarettes to smoke – purely an indulgence

You see, what I think most of these government officials seem to be overlooking is that no one needs a cigarette to live but we all need our lungs in order to draw life giving breath. Smoking doesn’t hold that honorable distinction of being a necessary component to living. In fact, smoking is just the opposite, it is simply a choice of lifestyle and it kills. In fact smoking could almost be considered a slow version of suicide because at some point it is going to kill the smoker.

And since secondhand smoke is worse than primary smoke, it could be considered a deadly weapon.

The point I am trying to make here is this: We need laws to ban public smoking because it interferes with basic life functions.

What is more important: an activity of pleasure and addiction or sustaining life?

If you don’t think breathing is all that important, go put your head under water and try to breathe.

For those councilors who can’t seem to make a decision about enacting a smoke free ban because they haven’t had enough time to look over the issue, go to our neighbors such as Danville, Lexington, Louisville, Georgetown where they have already enacted smoke free bans and on any given night you have to stand in line just to get into a restaurant. The arguments that it will hurt business is just hype that has been generated to create fear in the business owner. But the facts are, business will only get better.

And as far as forcing a smoking ban on a property owner, if this was a private and personal thing such as in your own home or automobile, then these owners should have every right to smoke as much as they want; but when they open their doors to the PUBLIC and ask you to come do business with them, then it should be a requirement that they provide the safest environment possible to the consumer and employee; and that should also include a non-toxic breathing environment.

This isn’t a religious issue; it’s not about sexual orientation; it’s not about whether you are a Republican or Democrat and who you are voting for this year; this is about life and health issues; possibly even life and death.

And yes, smoking is that bad and it is that dangerous – it does kill and it destroys health. Just ask anyone who has asthma or some other COPD.

Personally, I think it is time that our local government officials get up off their seats and begin to earn our tax dollars that we pay them and do something about this dangerous issue that all Pulaski Countians face.

For those who want to smoke, I don’t want to take that away from them and it is just as easy to light up after a meal outside the restaurant once the dining experience is over. But for the majority of Pulaski Countians who I am sure do not smoke, we encourage you to take the bull by the horns, quit putting this off and come to a decision.

Sincerely,

J.R. Smith

Somerset, Ky.

Text Only

Letters

The Perils of Alcohol
Dear Editor:
The Feb. 1, 2012, front page news of the Commonwealth Journal, read in big, bold letters, ALCOHOL at Eagle’s Nest.

February 9, 2012
Reenactment Poorly Planned
Dear Editor:
In response to the article by staff writer Chris Harris concerning the Battle of Mill Springs recently held in your county. I have concerns over the objectivity of the content, particularly with Bill Neikirk’s comments.
I am a living historian and travel from Florida to Virginia taking part in approximately 30 events per year; thus, I do know something of which I speak.

February 9, 2012
Rockcastle Hospital responds to article
Dear Editor:
This letter is in response to the article printed January 31, 2012, in the Commonwealth Journal titled “Local Nursing Homes on par with rest of nation.” The article incorrectly noted that the only Kentucky nursing home with zero deficiencies was the Nursing Facility of Hardin Memorial Hospital in Elizabethtown. I would kindly ask you to correct the information to include our facility.

February 6, 2012
Western Pulaski Water could communicate better
Dear Editor:
Last weekend, residents of Pulaski County who have “city water” were affected by the countywide boil water advisory. This was the first time I can remember the entire county being under such an advisory. When the accident occurred at the City Water plant last Thursday afternoon, print and broadcast media serving Pulaski County were advised.

February 3, 2012
Reader not so happy ban
Dear Editor:
I am writing this letter in response to the recent Somerset city limits Smoking Ban.
I would like to know WHY the city council can stop smoking in nursing homes. The nursing homes are OUR HOME! This is the only home that many nursing home residents have had for many, many years.

January 31, 2012
Thank you, city council
Dear Editor:
To say that I had come to believe that I would never see happen in Somerset what came to pass at the most recent Somerset City Council meeting would be an understatement.

January 31, 2012
Kentucky children need expanded preschool
To understand why my proposed budget expands access to preschool to 4,000 more Kentucky 4 year olds, it helps to imagine two kindergarten classes arriving for the first day of school.
In one class, the kids are bright-eyed and healthy. They know the alphabet, their numbers, and a little rudimentary math (think basic addition and subtraction). They can even read a little bit, and are able hold a conversation with adults. In short, they’re confident, curious, creative and energetic. They want to learn.
In the other class, the kids are just the opposite. Several have health problems, like tooth aches, asthma and lingering sickness caused by poor nutrition. They’ve never been read to, don’t know either their letters or numbers and can’t spell their names. They’re too timid to interact with their teachers and classmates, show little interest in anything around them and—to summarize—are completely unengaged.
You don’t have to be a kindergarten teacher to predict the outcome of the year: One class will learn, the other will struggle.
When the students enter first grade the following year, the same gap will exist, only it’ll be larger. In later grades, the gap will be larger still.
Barring aggressive intervention, the kids who began their school careers behind are likely to remain behind the rest of their lives.
That’s why getting our youngest children off to a good start—by laying a foundation of good health and cognitive development that enables them to hit the ground running in kindergarten—has been one of my top priorities as governor.
The seeds of learning are planted early in life. Earlier, even, than kindergarten. Scientists say that some 90 percent of physical brain development occurs from birth to age 3.
That’s why we’ve brought health care coverage to nearly 60,000 children whose families didn’t have any.
We’ve improved dental care for tens of thousands of children by increasing the number of dentists who treat children and bringing treatment straight to our classrooms.
We’re aligning our preschool and early care programs around a common definition of kindergarten readiness, one that guides our care workers in preparing our children mentally, physically, emotionally and socially to do the work involved in kindergarten.
And we’re seeking to expand access to preschool to 4,430 of our at-risk 4-year-olds.
My proposed budget for the 2013-2014 biennium—which I presented to the General Assembly on Jan. 17—includes $15 million to expand eligibility to families whose incomes are 160 percent or less of the federal poverty level, up from the current cut-off of 150 percent.
Bu the end of my term, I intend to set eligibility levels at 200 percent or below, which would help us add 3,920 additional children on top of this year’s gain.
Anecdotally, this makes sense.
Statistically, it’s a wise investment.
The Committee for Economic Development -- a national nonprofit, nonpartisan business-led public policy organization -- produced a report funded by the Pew Charitable Trust that studied the benefits of early childhood education. The report found that kids who had access to high-quality preschool were less likely to drop out of school, less likely to commit crimes, earned higher incomes and were healthier.
Consequently, experts say that every dollar spent on preschool programs carries a return on investment that ranges from $2 to $17.
The formula is simple—we can invest in our children early, or we can pay substantially higher costs later for things like remedial school work, basic job training, expanded welfare and prison costs.
If we don’t give kids the best possible start to their education, the bill comes due again, again and again.
Our people—especially our children—are Kentucky’s greatest resource.
To bring transformational change to our state, we must cultivate that resource by making substantial investments in our intellectual infrastructure.
Even in the most wretched financial times, there are certain investments that we cannot ignore.
But this is more than a financial argument. It’s also a moral one.
We owe all of our children—whether they live in our inner cities or our mountain hollows, our suburbs or our farms -- a chance at a promising and productive life.
And that process starts early.

January 26, 2012 1 Photo
Act of Kindness Appreciated
Dear Editor:
Santa Claus does not always wear a red suit and a red hat with white fur, neither does he have soot on his clothes from the chimney.

January 25, 2012
Subsidies and Socialism
Dear Editor:
Robert Moore is totally wrong about the Black Lung Program. I worked as a disability examiner when Black Lung was enacted. Black Lung was a political boondoggle for buying votes.

January 24, 2012
‘What’s a body to do?’
Dear Editor:
My wife and I drive about 60,000 miles a year and we are naturally concernend about gasoline prices.
Retailers say the prices are regulated by the distributors. Distributors say the prices are regulated by the market.

January 12, 2012
More Letters Headlines