Somerset —
Dear Editor:
The recent public comments by Ms. Ashley Judd regarding the people of East Kentucky, the practice of mountaintop removal, and the coal industry in general, struck a nerve with many Kentuckians, rightfully so.
Coal, particularly the practice of mountaintop removal, has been, and will continue to be, a controversial subject of debate as America moves toward “clean energy” and “energy independence.” That issue is out of the scope for this argument.
Judd makes several plausible statements within her arguments, and she is well within her rights to do so. However, Ms. Judd misses the point in the fact that she does not, nor likely will she ever, actually live in East Kentucky. She refers to coal industry leaders as “cunning, callous and greedy outsiders.” Her views toward the region can be viewed as much of the same.
In his 1962 book, Night Comes to the Cumberlands: A Biography of a Depressed Area, the late Whitesburg author, lawyer and professor Harry Caudill shed light to the nation about the social and economic distress prevalent throughout the coalfields of Central Appalachia.
This provocative book, written by one of our own, ruffled the feathers of many people living both within and outside of the region. It also caught the attention of the federal government.
Caudill, an outspoken critic of the coal industry, become somewhat of a spokesperson for Appalachia. However, not only did Harry Caudill advocate for change in the region, but he also lived here. He was one of us. He understood the role the coal played in the region, but realized perplexities often associated with it.
Caudill, although controversial, had a vested interest in advocating for change in Appalachia, not only because his observations and personal convictions, but because he lived here.
Presently, environmentalists, including Ashley Judd, “lash out” against our coal industry through press conferences, propaganda, books, scholarly articles and rallies in Frankfort and Washington, D.C. This vilification of the coal industry comes with little willingness to understand the positive impact coal, and mountaintop removal, has for the people of East Kentucky and American society. Much of this can be attributed to the fact that many of these environmentalist don’t even live here. They do not understand.
There is no denying the continued diversification our region’s economy, to one not as reliant on the “boom and bust” conditions associated with the demand for coal, would reap benefits for East Kentucky. However, many of the changes advocated for by environmentalists are not only off base, but simply unrealistic.
Ashley Judd, who refers to East Kentucky as the place her family has called home for many generations, and which she adamantly proclaims to be so “proud” of, chooses to live outside the area. It is quite possible she is as out of touch as the “cunning, callous and greedy outsiders” she mistakenly portrays the coal industry leaders to be.
Mountaintop removal provides jobs for our people, flat land for development and energy for America. However, it is apparent; one can’t fully appreciate these positive impacts unless one actually lives here.
Many people in East Kentucky would likely be more receptive to Ms. Judd’s criticisms of coal if she, like Harry Caudill, actually chose to reside here.
I commend Ashley Judd on her success as an actress, her recently obtained degree from Harvard, and her continual support of our UK Wildcats. However, this does not qualify her to be a spokesperson for our region, a region which she obviously does not understand.
Brad Parke
Hindman, KY 41822
Letters
Ashley Judd Out of Touch With Region
- Letters
-
-
Group opposed to alcohol at Eagle’s Nest
Dear Editor:
K.I.D.S. (Keep It Dry and Safe) of Somerset and Pulaski County is opposed to the sale of alcohol at the Eagle’s Nest Golf Course in the Caney Fork Precinct of Pulaski County, Ky. -
The Perils of Alcohol
Dear Editor:
The Feb. 1, 2012, front page news of the Commonwealth Journal, read in big, bold letters, ALCOHOL at Eagle’s Nest. -
Reenactment Poorly Planned
Dear Editor:
In response to the article by staff writer Chris Harris concerning the Battle of Mill Springs recently held in your county. I have concerns over the objectivity of the content, particularly with Bill Neikirk’s comments.
I am a living historian and travel from Florida to Virginia taking part in approximately 30 events per year; thus, I do know something of which I speak. -
Rockcastle Hospital responds to article
Dear Editor:
This letter is in response to the article printed January 31, 2012, in the Commonwealth Journal titled “Local Nursing Homes on par with rest of nation.” The article incorrectly noted that the only Kentucky nursing home with zero deficiencies was the Nursing Facility of Hardin Memorial Hospital in Elizabethtown. I would kindly ask you to correct the information to include our facility. -
Western Pulaski Water could communicate better
Dear Editor:
Last weekend, residents of Pulaski County who have “city water” were affected by the countywide boil water advisory. This was the first time I can remember the entire county being under such an advisory. When the accident occurred at the City Water plant last Thursday afternoon, print and broadcast media serving Pulaski County were advised. -
Reader not so happy ban
Dear Editor:
I am writing this letter in response to the recent Somerset city limits Smoking Ban.
I would like to know WHY the city council can stop smoking in nursing homes. The nursing homes are OUR HOME! This is the only home that many nursing home residents have had for many, many years. -
Thank you, city council
Dear Editor:
To say that I had come to believe that I would never see happen in Somerset what came to pass at the most recent Somerset City Council meeting would be an understatement. -
Kentucky children need expanded preschool
To understand why my proposed budget expands access to preschool to 4,000 more Kentucky 4 year olds, it helps to imagine two kindergarten classes arriving for the first day of school.
In one class, the kids are bright-eyed and healthy. They know the alphabet, their numbers, and a little rudimentary math (think basic addition and subtraction). They can even read a little bit, and are able hold a conversation with adults. In short, they’re confident, curious, creative and energetic. They want to learn.
In the other class, the kids are just the opposite. Several have health problems, like tooth aches, asthma and lingering sickness caused by poor nutrition. They’ve never been read to, don’t know either their letters or numbers and can’t spell their names. They’re too timid to interact with their teachers and classmates, show little interest in anything around them and—to summarize—are completely unengaged.
You don’t have to be a kindergarten teacher to predict the outcome of the year: One class will learn, the other will struggle.
When the students enter first grade the following year, the same gap will exist, only it’ll be larger. In later grades, the gap will be larger still.
Barring aggressive intervention, the kids who began their school careers behind are likely to remain behind the rest of their lives.
That’s why getting our youngest children off to a good start—by laying a foundation of good health and cognitive development that enables them to hit the ground running in kindergarten—has been one of my top priorities as governor.
The seeds of learning are planted early in life. Earlier, even, than kindergarten. Scientists say that some 90 percent of physical brain development occurs from birth to age 3.
That’s why we’ve brought health care coverage to nearly 60,000 children whose families didn’t have any.
We’ve improved dental care for tens of thousands of children by increasing the number of dentists who treat children and bringing treatment straight to our classrooms.
We’re aligning our preschool and early care programs around a common definition of kindergarten readiness, one that guides our care workers in preparing our children mentally, physically, emotionally and socially to do the work involved in kindergarten.
And we’re seeking to expand access to preschool to 4,430 of our at-risk 4-year-olds.
My proposed budget for the 2013-2014 biennium—which I presented to the General Assembly on Jan. 17—includes $15 million to expand eligibility to families whose incomes are 160 percent or less of the federal poverty level, up from the current cut-off of 150 percent.
Bu the end of my term, I intend to set eligibility levels at 200 percent or below, which would help us add 3,920 additional children on top of this year’s gain.
Anecdotally, this makes sense.
Statistically, it’s a wise investment.
The Committee for Economic Development -- a national nonprofit, nonpartisan business-led public policy organization -- produced a report funded by the Pew Charitable Trust that studied the benefits of early childhood education. The report found that kids who had access to high-quality preschool were less likely to drop out of school, less likely to commit crimes, earned higher incomes and were healthier.
Consequently, experts say that every dollar spent on preschool programs carries a return on investment that ranges from $2 to $17.
The formula is simple—we can invest in our children early, or we can pay substantially higher costs later for things like remedial school work, basic job training, expanded welfare and prison costs.
If we don’t give kids the best possible start to their education, the bill comes due again, again and again.
Our people—especially our children—are Kentucky’s greatest resource.
To bring transformational change to our state, we must cultivate that resource by making substantial investments in our intellectual infrastructure.
Even in the most wretched financial times, there are certain investments that we cannot ignore.
But this is more than a financial argument. It’s also a moral one.
We owe all of our children—whether they live in our inner cities or our mountain hollows, our suburbs or our farms -- a chance at a promising and productive life.
And that process starts early. -
Act of Kindness Appreciated
Dear Editor:
Santa Claus does not always wear a red suit and a red hat with white fur, neither does he have soot on his clothes from the chimney. -
Subsidies and Socialism
Dear Editor:
Robert Moore is totally wrong about the Black Lung Program. I worked as a disability examiner when Black Lung was enacted. Black Lung was a political boondoggle for buying votes. - More Letters Headlines
-
Group opposed to alcohol at Eagle’s Nest


