People for Ethical Government not surprised by AG probe in Pulaski

Letters

March 4, 2010

letters to the editor

by Jewell Florea, President; People for Ethical Government The Commonwealth Journal Thu Mar 04, 2010, 09:50 AM EST

Dear Editor:

I am writing in response to the article entitled, “County Road Tile Placement Prompted State AG Probe,” which appeared in the Sunday, Feb. 14, edition of the Commonwealth Journal.

As noted in the article, the Attorney General undertook this investigation of county road tile placement in response to a complaint filed by the citizens’ organization, People for Ethical Government. As president of that organization, I feel it is important that readers of your newspaper understand why we filed our complaint, and why we believe Pulaski County taxpayers and voters should be concerned about Pulaski Fiscal Court’s practice of providing drainage tiles for private landowners and real estate developers.

It is our belief that the tile give-aways are a violation of both the Kentucky Constitution and the Kentucky Revised Statutes. Sections 171 of the Kentucky Constitution states, “Taxes shall be levied and collected for public purposes only. ...” We contend that using tax dollars to facilitate access to private driveways does not serve a public purpose.

KRS 179.380 states: (1) “The owner or tenant of lands fronting on a public road shall construct and keep in repair all approaches or driveways to and from the public road under the direction of the county engineer”; and (2) “No owner or tenant shall fill up any ditch or place anything in any ditch so as to interfere with the purposes for which it was made.”

We interpret this to mean that it is the responsibility of the owner or tenant, not the taxpayer, to ensure that his/her driveway does not fill or interfere with the ditch. This interpretation is consistent with that of a number of Attorney General’s opinions and court rulings. It is also consistent with the Kentucky Transportation Department’s policy, which requires property owners to provide drainage tiles where private entrances join state roads and highways.

We also believe that giving tiles to private property owners and real estate developers is a violation of the Pulaski County Administrative Code. Page 13 of the code states: “Pulaski County Road Department will furnish one (1) 20-foot section of tile for private entrance with the balance of necessary tile being furnished by the property owner. ...”

Inexplicably, this policy is contradicted in the very next paragraph, which states: “Property owner has the obligation to furnish any and all tile necessary to handle water flow to be determined by Road Foreman for any new entrance.”

Pages 12 and 13 of the code also contain a list of eleven “criteria which shall be considered in determining acceptance of any road into the Pulaski County Road Program.”

Criteria number 8 states: “All new roads and subdivision streets must have suitable roadway drainage. This must be achieved through both curbs and gutters or ditches with adequate size drainage tiles.”

Our review of county road work requests revealed that magistrates routinely order drainage tiles for subdivision streets, in spite of the requirement that developers provide suitable drainage before these streets are accepted into the county road system.

According to the Attorney General’s investigative report, county officials defended the practice of providing drainage tiles for private driveways on the grounds that the tiles are placed on the county right of way and that doing so is cheaper than grading out the ditch, which would become blocked if the tile was not provided. We believe that the first argument is effectively nullified by KRS 179.380 and that the second is not a legal argument, but a fiscal rationalization which would not hold up in court. Nevertheless, upon reviewing the report, Commonwealth Attorney Eddy Montgomery declined to prosecute.

Members of People for Ethical Government are not particularly surprised or discouraged by the outcome of the Attorney General’s investigation.

Our mission is not to see local officials prosecuted for practicing “politics as usual,” but rather to encourage and support political and governmental reform. We believe an informed and engaged electorate is an essential ingredient in the reform we seek, and to the extent that the Attorney General’s investigation of county road tile placement focused public attention on the subject, we are quite pleased with the outcome. It is our hope that, in the remaining months before the upcoming election, candidates for county judge-executive, magistrate and county attorney will be prompted to publicly state their position on this issue.

Finally, we issue this challenge to Pulaski County voters: As you travel the county roads, notice the number and location of drainage tiles. You will see tiles at numerous private driveways, many leading to barns, fields and empty lots. Go to the courthouse and ask to see copies of the magistrates’ road work requests. You will find that fiscal court spent in excess of one hundred eighty five thousand dollars ($185,000) on tiles in just the first three years of the current administration.

Considering the current state of the economy and record levels of unemployment, with county government diverting over two million dollars from the fire protection fund just to balance the budget, is this a practice that we can afford to continue?

Is it really more cost effective to provide these tiles than to grade ditches that may become clogged?

Is it fair to provide free tiles for those who own property on county roads while those who own property on state roads must now provide their own tiles?

Is it ethical for government to spend your taxes to facilitate access to private property?

Are you in favor of government give-aways and higher taxes or individual responsibility and lower taxes?

For members and supporters of People for Ethical Government the answers to these questions are obvious.

Thank You,

Jewell Florea, President

People for Ethical Government

www.peopleforethicalgovement.org

Text Only

Letters

The Perils of Alcohol
Dear Editor:
The Feb. 1, 2012, front page news of the Commonwealth Journal, read in big, bold letters, ALCOHOL at Eagle’s Nest.

February 9, 2012
Reenactment Poorly Planned
Dear Editor:
In response to the article by staff writer Chris Harris concerning the Battle of Mill Springs recently held in your county. I have concerns over the objectivity of the content, particularly with Bill Neikirk’s comments.
I am a living historian and travel from Florida to Virginia taking part in approximately 30 events per year; thus, I do know something of which I speak.

February 9, 2012
Rockcastle Hospital responds to article
Dear Editor:
This letter is in response to the article printed January 31, 2012, in the Commonwealth Journal titled “Local Nursing Homes on par with rest of nation.” The article incorrectly noted that the only Kentucky nursing home with zero deficiencies was the Nursing Facility of Hardin Memorial Hospital in Elizabethtown. I would kindly ask you to correct the information to include our facility.

February 6, 2012
Western Pulaski Water could communicate better
Dear Editor:
Last weekend, residents of Pulaski County who have “city water” were affected by the countywide boil water advisory. This was the first time I can remember the entire county being under such an advisory. When the accident occurred at the City Water plant last Thursday afternoon, print and broadcast media serving Pulaski County were advised.

February 3, 2012
Reader not so happy ban
Dear Editor:
I am writing this letter in response to the recent Somerset city limits Smoking Ban.
I would like to know WHY the city council can stop smoking in nursing homes. The nursing homes are OUR HOME! This is the only home that many nursing home residents have had for many, many years.

January 31, 2012
Thank you, city council
Dear Editor:
To say that I had come to believe that I would never see happen in Somerset what came to pass at the most recent Somerset City Council meeting would be an understatement.

January 31, 2012
Kentucky children need expanded preschool
To understand why my proposed budget expands access to preschool to 4,000 more Kentucky 4 year olds, it helps to imagine two kindergarten classes arriving for the first day of school.
In one class, the kids are bright-eyed and healthy. They know the alphabet, their numbers, and a little rudimentary math (think basic addition and subtraction). They can even read a little bit, and are able hold a conversation with adults. In short, they’re confident, curious, creative and energetic. They want to learn.
In the other class, the kids are just the opposite. Several have health problems, like tooth aches, asthma and lingering sickness caused by poor nutrition. They’ve never been read to, don’t know either their letters or numbers and can’t spell their names. They’re too timid to interact with their teachers and classmates, show little interest in anything around them and—to summarize—are completely unengaged.
You don’t have to be a kindergarten teacher to predict the outcome of the year: One class will learn, the other will struggle.
When the students enter first grade the following year, the same gap will exist, only it’ll be larger. In later grades, the gap will be larger still.
Barring aggressive intervention, the kids who began their school careers behind are likely to remain behind the rest of their lives.
That’s why getting our youngest children off to a good start—by laying a foundation of good health and cognitive development that enables them to hit the ground running in kindergarten—has been one of my top priorities as governor.
The seeds of learning are planted early in life. Earlier, even, than kindergarten. Scientists say that some 90 percent of physical brain development occurs from birth to age 3.
That’s why we’ve brought health care coverage to nearly 60,000 children whose families didn’t have any.
We’ve improved dental care for tens of thousands of children by increasing the number of dentists who treat children and bringing treatment straight to our classrooms.
We’re aligning our preschool and early care programs around a common definition of kindergarten readiness, one that guides our care workers in preparing our children mentally, physically, emotionally and socially to do the work involved in kindergarten.
And we’re seeking to expand access to preschool to 4,430 of our at-risk 4-year-olds.
My proposed budget for the 2013-2014 biennium—which I presented to the General Assembly on Jan. 17—includes $15 million to expand eligibility to families whose incomes are 160 percent or less of the federal poverty level, up from the current cut-off of 150 percent.
Bu the end of my term, I intend to set eligibility levels at 200 percent or below, which would help us add 3,920 additional children on top of this year’s gain.
Anecdotally, this makes sense.
Statistically, it’s a wise investment.
The Committee for Economic Development -- a national nonprofit, nonpartisan business-led public policy organization -- produced a report funded by the Pew Charitable Trust that studied the benefits of early childhood education. The report found that kids who had access to high-quality preschool were less likely to drop out of school, less likely to commit crimes, earned higher incomes and were healthier.
Consequently, experts say that every dollar spent on preschool programs carries a return on investment that ranges from $2 to $17.
The formula is simple—we can invest in our children early, or we can pay substantially higher costs later for things like remedial school work, basic job training, expanded welfare and prison costs.
If we don’t give kids the best possible start to their education, the bill comes due again, again and again.
Our people—especially our children—are Kentucky’s greatest resource.
To bring transformational change to our state, we must cultivate that resource by making substantial investments in our intellectual infrastructure.
Even in the most wretched financial times, there are certain investments that we cannot ignore.
But this is more than a financial argument. It’s also a moral one.
We owe all of our children—whether they live in our inner cities or our mountain hollows, our suburbs or our farms -- a chance at a promising and productive life.
And that process starts early.

January 26, 2012 1 Photo
Act of Kindness Appreciated
Dear Editor:
Santa Claus does not always wear a red suit and a red hat with white fur, neither does he have soot on his clothes from the chimney.

January 25, 2012
Subsidies and Socialism
Dear Editor:
Robert Moore is totally wrong about the Black Lung Program. I worked as a disability examiner when Black Lung was enacted. Black Lung was a political boondoggle for buying votes.

January 24, 2012
‘What’s a body to do?’
Dear Editor:
My wife and I drive about 60,000 miles a year and we are naturally concernend about gasoline prices.
Retailers say the prices are regulated by the distributors. Distributors say the prices are regulated by the market.

January 12, 2012
More Letters Headlines