I have been reading the letters to the editor both condemning and supporting Willie Ramsey.
My intent is not to support or not support Ramsey. It is to question the logic of those who would use the First Amendment to our Constitution to question his “right” to express his religious beliefs in a public forum, while at the same time using the same First Amendment to advocate the “separation of church and state.”
The two clauses from the First Amendment which apply to the above state, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, ...“
First of all the words, “Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech, ’’ covers Ramsey’s Right to express his personal feelings in a newspaper “letters to the editor’s section.” Just as it does to those responding to him.
The other words, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; ...” is where the actual conflict starts. That is the clause referred to as declaring the “separation of church and state.”
I take that clause to mean that no government entity shall advocate the establishment of any “government sponsored or national religion.” One of the basis for the creation of our country was to allow each person to worship and believe as they choose. I believe that’s why those words are there.
No where does it say, or imply, that the government is forbidden to, “advocate religion,” only “a specific religion.”
Those words have been interpreted by our courts to mean the elimination of all religious expression by any level of federal, state or local government entity. This has been championed by a small minority of those on the far left extremist liberal side.
It should be obvious to anyone who really objectively listens to their words, that their true agenda is to remove religious expression from all aspects of our society, private or public.
These people bring forward the concept that, our Constitution was created as a “living document.” As a “living document,” it was designed to be changed as time passed and the “prevailing attitudes of our people” change.
These people will argue that their concerns are aimed at “human rights and individual rights.” How can you discuss “human and individual rights ,” without discussing personal religious beliefs ?
This concept has actually has been proven true by how over the past 75 years. Laws have been passed, Amendments to the Constitution passed and numerous interpretations, of our Constitution, by the courts based on the “changing and prevailing attitudes” of our society. Some areas this has applied to are minority rights (race), women’s rights, voting rights, and at the present, homosexual rights. Most of us would agree that these “changes” have benefited our society.
Over the course of our history religion/spiritualism has developed into a major aspect of our society. To many it has become the basis for their existence. Studies and surveys have consistently shown that between 80 to 90 percent of our people share some type of religious/spirituality. These beliefs manifest themselves in many different forms, but do exist.
The percentage of “non-believers” consistently stays around 10 percent of our people.
The above shows a dramatic increase in our “prevailing attitude” toward religious beliefs, by a vast majority of our people.
Would this not indicate that it is time for changes to this “living document (Constitution)” based upon the concept of “prevailing attitudes?”
If we truly honored and respected the beliefs of all people, how could that possibly “offend” those of any believers or non-believers, or violate the words of the First Amendment?
Here’s where I get in trouble. What would be wrong with a high school principal standing before a graduation ceremony and stating, “Please join us in a moment of silent prayer. Please pray as your personal beliefs dictate. If you choose not to pray please maintain a moment of silence”?
Would that be “advocating a specific religion, or would it be truly practicing “tolerance and diversity ?”
When Barack Obama was sworn in as our new president, he swore an oath to “God” with his hand on a “Christian Bible.” Does anyone actually believe he was advocating Christianity as a “government sponsored religion?”
Columns
Related Photos
-
Danny Calhoon
The First Amendment can be a tricky thing
Opinion
- Columns
-
-
Long live Barnabas Collins
-
The big game ... and patterns
-
Survival techniques
With the reduction of our armed forces, many citizens will be returning to civilian life as veterans. Service in the military can be a stressful experience; an experience most will agree they would do all over again, but must be accompanied by a goodly amount of physical and psychological defense mechanisms; one of which is humor, and no one or anything is immune or off limits, including fellow comrades-in-arms.
-
Word Play
Valentine’s Day is something that you have to just sort of ... survive.
For single people, that’s particularly true. Speaking as perhaps Somerset’s most eligible bachelor — if I were to get any more eligible, I could probably finagle my own reality show on ABC — I can tell you just about every paragraph in the “Valentine’s Day Survival Guide” handbook.
Denial? Check. Decry the holiday as a crass invention of the greeting card/floral/chocolate corporate machine? Check. Stay indoors? Check. Board up the windows and barricade the doors, a la “Night of the Living Dead”? Check and check. -
A House in disarray
During the 2010 elections there was something going on that many people have not paid attention to but that is all about to end. There is a constitutional requirement that a census be conducted every ten years for purposes of defining proper representation in our government. While all the talking heads and media outlets focused on the statewide and national elections there were thousands of local elections being held that would determine control of the various state houses. It is those state houses and, specifically, the party in power that determines where the boundary lines are to be drawn to ensure that each person has a more or less equally powerful vote. Simple isn't it. Well, not so much.
-
Recreation needs drugs?
One of the favorite politically correct phrases of today is “recreational drugs.” That really gets my dandruff up even through the Brylcreem.
-
Taxpayer Subsidies
An article I read in the newspaper stated that the Kentucky Supreme Court had reached a verdict in a split decision that would make applicants for Black Lung benefits have to meet the same criteria for benefits for similar lung diseases from a different causative agent. Pneumoconiosis is the disease and it can be caused by inhaling dust from any source so the qualifications for benefits for this disease should be the same across the board and not be different just because sufferers of Black Lung get it from coal dust. However, written standards have made qualification for benefits for Pneumoconiosis resulting from coal dust more difficult. This is unfair and discriminatory and it seems the court reached an equitable decision that will result in many more miners being eligible for taxpayer funded benefits.
-
Smoking ban is a good idea
-
We’re all pill-poppers & junk food junkies
Anyone who grew up in the Eubank area in the 50’s and 60’s probably remembers our local general practice physician Dr. Williams; a wonderful man. I only remember one occasion when my parents took me to see him. I was delirious with a temperature of 103 and Dr. Williams gave me a shot of penicillin. I may have been delirious but I remember that needle; it must have been three inches long and the size of a pencil lead.
-
How do you restore earning power of the middle class?
I don't think a story in this yet young new year has chilled me quite so much as the January 2, 2012 story in the Lexington Herald-Leader about General Electric in Louisville planning to hire new workers. With wages dropping domestically, General Electric is proposing to increase manufacturing of appliances.
- More Columns Headlines
-
Ravi Spared Prison in Rutgers Webcam Case
Miss. Prison Quiet After Riot; 1 Dead
Obama Confident Afghans Can Take Security Lead
Raw Video: Deadly Bombing at Yemen Parade Preps
Professor: Chinese Activist's 'Spirit Is Good'
Ring of Fire Eclipse Seen in U.S., Asia
Golden Gate Bridge Celebrates 75 Years
G-8 Seeks Unity on Euro-debt Crisis, Iran
Prosecutors: Trio Planned to Attack Obama's HQ
Obama: G8 Unified in Stance on Iran, Syria
